Ad: [ ? ]
TODAY

Tuesday, October 21

Gapers Block
Search

Gapers Block on Facebook Gapers Block on Flickr Gapers Block on Twitter The Gapers Block Tumblr


The Mechanics
« Chicago's Chief Environment Officer Interviewed Chicago's Chief Environment Officer Interviewed »

TIFs Wed Nov 04 2009

How We Can Use TIF Funds

As the issue of tax increment financing (TIF) districts and the non-appropriated "shadow budget" they generate moves into mainstream media coverage, it's important to remember a couple two tree things about TIF funds, the main one being that the money in TIF accounts is not interchangeable with the money that is missing (the deficit) in the city budget.

First, TIFs are ultimately regulated by state statute. [PDF]

Second, TIF funds are property tax funds, and they can't just be spent however. The state statute limits what the money can be spent on. So although the Mayor controls some $1 billion in TIF funds, that money can't just be spent the same as the corporation funds the City spends on most of its budget; by state law it has to be spent inside the TIF district (or an adjacent district) and on statute-defined things.

Third, and related to that, is that the money in TIF funds is not the city's money per se. So if the TIF districts had not existed, the subsequent money raised would not be "freed up" for the city to use; it would return to the following taxing bodies (via the now-defunct NCBG):

tif_chart.gif

You can see, the big loser is the school district (though, as detailed in this Whet Moser/Ben Joravsky post, the state makes up much of this cash) not the city.

The reason this is important to keep in mind is that with an issue as complicated as TIFs, it will become easy for sloganeering to mischaracterize an issue in the public consciousness -- "Why don't you just use some of that TIF money to bail out the CTA?"--and that can ultimately lead to bad policy. My complaint against TIFs has been that it creates a non-legislative budget that the executive can use as a cudgel against legislators. But if those TIF districts did not exist, only 20 percent of their increment would be going to the city.

So while the $500m yearly "shadow budget" Joravsky and Dumke laid out in their brilliant piece in the Reader is real and shocking, we shouldn't start assuming that that money is fungible with the City's budget shortfalls; you can't simply take the money from the TIF funds and pour it into the city's budget.

The other thing to keep in mind is that a lot of the initial money for TIF projects comes from the issuance of bonds "against" the TIF, meaning the bonds are sold up front, and the increment is used to pay down the bonds. So the city often incurs debt in the process of making a TIF. Just sayin'.

 

AK / November 4, 2009 11:13 AM

You should clarify what you mean when you state that "a lot of the initial money for TIF projects comes from the issuance of bonds 'against' the TIF..." In my limited experience with TIF's, and the way the TIF application reads, bonds are only necessary if any work is to be done in what the city and the TIF application call "the public way", e.g. the renovations on a building involve tearing up the sidewalk in order to access structural elements of the building.

It's also worth noting, along these lines, that TIF funding is retroactive, meaning it gets paid out either after a project is completed or in quarterly or half-year portions as phases of the project are completed. Because of this, anyone that wants TIF funding must pay for the entire project or individual phases of the project up front. They can do this through their own capital, equity, private financing, or bonds; but regardless, TIF doesn't come in until a project is actually completed, or a specific phase is completed.

In any case, and because I'm new at the TIF thing (I'm currently consulting a company on their TIF application, which is a new experience for all of us), I'd like to know what you know about the bond issue. Again, I'm under the impression that bonds are only necessary if any work is to be done "in the public way."

Ramsin / November 4, 2009 11:22 AM

Good point--yes, the issuance of bonds is only for TIF districts where there is some major public improvement planned; sewer being installed to serve more residences, roads being expanded or rebuilt, etc.; where the TIF is being created with no intention for some infrastructure improvement that is necessary for a development.

If you're building a mixed use structure, for example, there are probably traffic circulation, storm water, and sewage requirements to meet. If the developer doesn't agree to pick up the cost up front and get reimbursed by the TIF, then the city will often (not always) issue bonds against the TIF to finance the improvements.

Otherwise, the developer will raise the money--also, often, through bonds; and it is the existence of the TIF, that makes those bonds attractive.

Hugh / November 4, 2009 2:24 PM

"sloganeering ... can ultimately lead to bad policy."

other TIF slogans that leasd to bad policy:

TIFs are for the schools

TIFs are for parks

TIFs are for libraries

Ramsin / November 4, 2009 2:26 PM

Was that what the Mayor said in BEZ interview?

I'm not sure, but I wouldn't be surprised if the biggest use of funds was for corporate subsidies, which ARE allowed by state statute.

Hugh / November 4, 2009 2:29 PM

" ...you can't simply take the money from the TIF funds and pour them into the city's budget."

YES WE CAN

there IS a way to get the accumulated TIF funds working for our City, schools, parks, and libraries: dissolve the TIF districts. Declare victory in some. In others, we changed course due to changing circumstance - we can do that.

Getting Creative With Daley's TIF Network

by Angela Caputo And Josh Kalven

http://progressillinois.com/2009/6/24/getting-creative-tif-network

Hugh / November 4, 2009 2:32 PM

Daley will not provide comprehensive reporting on TIF expenditures because it is impossible to do so without making it patently obvious that schools, parks, and libraries are a minor portion

Ramsin / November 4, 2009 2:42 PM

My thought was that the money currently in accounts (already collected) couldn't be used to, say, pay for sworn officers in the CPD or for shortfalls in expected sales tax revenue.

Josh & Angela's piece provides a great roadmap to how the entire TIF regime could be overhauled.

My favorite:

"The state legislature could also prevent the hoarding of tax dollars exhibited by Daley. For instance, State Sen. Mike Noland (D-Springfield) attempted to add a “use-it-or-lose-it” amendment to the TIF code (SB 1990) this spring. The bill would force municipalities to spend the surpluses or turn it back over for public services. However, it never moved out of the Senate Revenue Committee."

Hugh / November 4, 2009 5:03 PM

"...the money currently in accounts (already collected) couldn't be used to, say, pay for sworn officers in the CPD or for shortfalls in expected sales tax revenue."

dissolve a TIF, pro-rate the outstanding balance between the taxing bodies, and the TIF dough flows into their general revenues

Elizabeth / March 20, 2012 11:34 AM

I am working with community development program
i wan to apply for fundding how it will be posibal

Add a Comment




Please enter the letter v in the field below:



Live Comment Preview


Notes & Tags

Items marked with a * are required fields. Please respect each other. We reserve the right to delete any comments borne out of douchebaggery or that deal in asshattery.

Permitted tags and how to use them:

To link: <a href="http://blahblahblah.com">Link text</a>
To italicize: <em>Your text</em>
To bold: <strong>Your text</strong>

Feature

How Lawsuits, Lobbyists and Parking Meter Deals Led to Ventra

By Jason Prechtel / 2 Comments

Cubic learned early on that if you don't win a contract through bidding, there are other ways to prevail. More...

Special Series

Classroom Mechanics Oral History Project



About Mechanics

Mechanics is the politics section of Gapers Block, reflecting the diversity of viewpoints and beliefs of Chicagoans and Illinoisans. More...
Please see our submission guidelines.

Editor: Monica Reida, mr@gapersblock.com
Mechanics staff inbox: mechanics@gapersblock.com

Archives

 

 Subscribe in a reader.

GB Store

GB Buttons $1.50

GB T-Shirt $12

I ✶ Chi T-Shirts $15

Newsletter

Sign up for our free email newsletter I Star Chi and get a weekly round-up of the best of Gapers Block, plus our picks for must-do events each weekend!

istarchi

Preferred format    Preferred format