Ad: [ ? ]
TODAY

Wednesday, April 16

Gapers Block
Search

Gapers Block on Facebook Gapers Block on Flickr Gapers Block on Twitter The Gapers Block Tumblr


The Mechanics
« It's Hard To Take You Seriously.... Jean-Claude Brizard: It's All About the Love--Take It or Leave It »

Open Government Wed Aug 24 2011

Transparency Ex Post and Ex Ante

democracybyspreadsheet.jpg
Since taking office just about a hundred days ago, Mayor Rahm Emanuel has pleased open government and transparency activists by creating a myriad of tools and data portals to open government information. All city employee salaries have been made easily accessible by the public, as well as 311 service requests, building permits, lobbyist data, and more.

At the risk of acquiring a John Kass-style cheap hater reputation, I had a good amount of fun making light of these actually impressive initiatives on Twitter, where I may or may not have referred to them as "democracy by spreadsheet." Recently, WBEZ ran a report looking at whether the Mayor's transparency initiatives were more appearance than reality.

New Chicago Chief Technology Officer John Tolva was a rightfully lauded pick for that office, and he has been feted for putting open government initiatives into "overdrive."

My point was not that these efforts to make city data open are not important and useful--they certainly are--but rather that they are not in and of themselves what government transparency is about. In a complex world, it is possible to both praise a government policy and point out that it isn't nearly sufficient.

What we've seen from the Emanuel administration has been ex post transparency--actions that represent what government accountability and transparency should result in. But they are not in and of themselves enough. Government transparency should be a function of accountability--public participation in government, not the fruits of a closed-door process of decision making.

In practice, what this means is that the institutions in City Hall that make data and information available should be accountable, open and publicly available. As it works right now, it appears that the decisions regarding which data should be made available, when, and in which format, are made by the Administration unilaterally. There is no ordinance debated and passed by our legislators identifying data sets for disclosure and mandating that disclosure.

In a similar vein, there is no body representing the public and various public bodies--similar to for example the Joint Review Boards that in theory monitor creation of tax increment financing--that can contribute to the decision making that surrounds transparency initiatives. Such institutions would add the element of accountability to transparency by including public voices in data release decision making.

Instead, the process is directed by the Mayor's office, and whatever input there is--and presumably, software developers are being heavily involved--is not particularly open.

From the TechPresident blog on Personal Democracy Forum,

With city Chief Data Officer Brett Goldstein, Tolva said, he's in Mayor Rahm Emanuel's office. For him, that's a crucial point -- and he says it's part of a nationwide wisening-up on the part of city executives.

Just as Nigel Jacob at the Office of New Urban Mechanics sits in the mayor's office, just as Rachel Sterne sits in the mayor's office in New York, I think what you're seeing in the last 18 months is an understanding of city executives that technology and the kind of innovations that it can foment deserve a seat at the table, deserves a seat at his or her table, and yet having a tight connection to the more operational aspects of city IT.

The "wisening up" of executives is unquestionably welcome, but it is not what accountability and transparency are about. When all the discretion lives on the Fifth Floor, a critical component of transparency and accountability is free from public pressure and shielded from public view. It goes without saying that these are not features of accountability and transparency. Mayor Emanuel has not bound himself or the office of the Mayor to any policy. He is simply exhibiting what beneficence it is comfortable for him to exhibit.

The ex ante--what happens before the fact--is what I'm interested in. The Fifth Floor's interest in opening government processes to public scrutiny and input is truly served precisely at the point of decision making, not after decisions have already been made. That is the kind of fundamental reform that cannot be undone by a unilateral decision at the top levels of government.

The current trend--which is a nicer word than ideology--in governance is to empower technocrats as a path to efficiency. The idea is that the experts know best in a complex policy world, so defer to them. It is a positive step forward for governments to bring in experts rather than, say, politicians' cousins, but those experts are rarely inherently aware of what the public wants or needs beyond the abstract. And in any case, their work should be guided and vetted by public bodies.

When we have real, binding, and often uncomfortable ex ante accountability, we'll end up with more meaningful ex post transparency. Until then, it may just be democracy by spreadsheet.

Josh / August 24, 2011 10:01 AM

I'm not sure what it is exactly that you are asking for in this article.

"What we've seen from the Emanuel administration has been ex post transparency--actions that represent what government accountability and transparency should result in." - I don't really understand what you are trying to say in this sentence. Please explain.

"In practice, what this means is that the institutions in City Hall that make data and information available should be accountable, open and publicly available. As it works right now, it appears that the decisions regarding which data should be made available, when, and in which format, are made by the Administration unilaterally." - This is not entirely true. There are many ways to request data so the public is an active partner in this.

Is it possible for you to explain specifically what ideas you have that could be implemented or changed? What does the picture of your perfect transparency look like? What does "ex ante" transparency look like? It is not clear from your article?

Ramsin / August 24, 2011 8:18 PM

I think it is as simple as involving the public in the decision making as to what information is released and how and when, and in a way that binds the administration. This can be done statutorily (by the City Council), or through creation of an independent office that incorporates public and quasi-public bodies and has discretion over what information is released, how, and when.

Add a Comment




Please enter the letter d in the field below:



Live Comment Preview


Notes & Tags

Items marked with a * are required fields. Please respect each other. We reserve the right to delete any comments borne out of douchebaggery or that deal in asshattery.

Permitted tags and how to use them:

To link: <a href="http://blahblahblah.com">Link text</a>
To italicize: <em>Your text</em>
To bold: <strong>Your text</strong>

Feature

How Lawsuits, Lobbyists and Parking Meter Deals Led to Ventra

By / 0 Comments

For the best reading experience, view fullscreen. May not be viewable in Internet Explorer 8 or older browsers. You can also read the text version below.... More...

Special Series

Classroom Mechanics Oral History Project



About Mechanics

Mechanics is the politics section of Gapers Block, reflecting the diversity of viewpoints and beliefs of Chicagoans and Illinoisans. More...
Please see our submission guidelines.

Editor: Monica Reida, mr@gapersblock.com
Mechanics staff inbox: mechanics@gapersblock.com

Archives

 

 Subscribe in a reader.

GB Store

GB Buttons $1.50

GB T-Shirt $12

I ✶ Chi T-Shirts $15